The cupboard will focus on whether or not the federal government ought to ramp up preparations for a no-deal Brexit when it meets later this morning.
It comes after Theresa Could stated MPs wouldn’t vote on her Brexit deal till the third week in January.
Labour chief Jeremy Corbyn has tabled a motion of no confidence in Mrs May, saying she had led the UK right into a “nationwide disaster”.
Quantity 10 dismissed the movement as “foolish political video games”.
With 101 days left till Brexit and plenty of MPs nonetheless against the federal government’s withdrawal settlement, ministers are on account of contemplate a paper on plans for leaving the EU with no deal.
However a no-deal Brexit can also be opposed by many MPs.
- Brexit: A really simple guide
- Reality Check: How could new referendum work?
- Kuenssberg: Don’t forget there is actually a deal
A cross-party group of 60 of them have written to the prime minister, saying it will do “pointless financial harm”.
Mr Corbyn is below strain to push for an additional vote of no confidence within the authorities as an entire.
On Monday evening, he tabled a movement calling on MPs to declare they haven’t any confidence within the prime minister as a result of she did not have a vote on her Brexit deal right away.
Mr Corbyn stated that, by January, a month would have been wasted for the reason that unique 11 December vote was postponed, with “not a single phrase renegotiated and never a single reassurance given”.
“The deal is unchanged and isn’t going to alter,” he stated.
No 10 refused to find time for the movement.
Different events – the SNP, Lib Dems, Plaid Cymru and the Greens – have known as on Mr Corbyn to push for a no-confidence vote towards the federal government as an entire.
In contrast to a vote aimed on the prime minister, the federal government must permit a vote on this movement and, if profitable, it may power a common election.
Labour’s shadow housing secretary, John Healey, advised BBC Radio 4’s As we speak programme on Tuesday that tabling a no confidence movement towards the federal government was “a query of when, not if”.
Nonetheless, Nigel Dodds, deputy chief of Northern Eire’s DUP, which has propped up the Conservative authorities since June 2017, dismissed Mr Corbyn’s transfer as “parliamentary antics”.
Mrs May additionally appeared to have the assist of pro-Brexit backbench critics who last week failed in a bid to oust her as Tory leader.
One in all them, Steve Baker, stated: “Eurosceptic Conservatives are clear that we settle for the democratic resolution of our occasion to have faith in Theresa Could as PM. We are going to vote towards Labour in any confidence movement.”
On Tuesday, the Daily Telegraph published a letter by 53 business leaders, together with former Sainsbury’s boss Justin King and Glastonbury Pageant founder Michael Eavis, calling on the prime minister to “take her deal to the British individuals”.
“The prime minister deserted crucial vote within the Home of Commons for a era as a result of she knew she couldn’t safe a parliamentary majority for her deal,” they wrote.
They stated final week’s riot by her personal MPs “underlines the impossibility of resuscitating it”.
The prime minister’s Brexit deal units out the phrases of Britain’s exit from the EU – on 29 March 2019 – and features a declaration on the define of the longer term relations between the UK and the EU.
However the deal solely comes into power if each the UK and European parliaments approve it.
The PM had delayed the vote from final week, admitting she appeared set to lose.
Mrs Could advised MPs they’d have the prospect to vote on the deal she negotiated with Brussels within the week starting 14 January.
She stated she had received recent ensures ultimately week’s EU summit over measures to keep away from a tough border on the island of Eire and he or she hoped to safe further “political and authorized assurances” within the coming weeks.
Earlier on Monday, an EU spokesman stated it had offered the “clarifications” requested on the contentious problem of the Northern Eire border backstop and “no additional conferences had been foreseen”.
Maintaining? I do not blame you if all of it looks like procedural nonsense. And albeit, you may not be utterly mistaken.
However what it suggests is that regardless of widespread frustration on all sides, Jeremy Corbyn is thus far stopping in need of taking an actual shot at toppling Could’s administration, and is unlikely to take action except, and till, he thinks he can win.
For her half, Theresa Could is unlikely to budge on her plan, except and till she is pressured to take action.
To the immense irritation of each their supporters and their rivals, though the Brexit clock is operating down, neither of the principle occasion leaders are keen to take the sort of radical transfer that may unblock the gridlock.